![]() We follow the approach of MacInnis (2011) to identify and describe characterizations of the concept, and then determine and differentiate the theoretical and practical implications. These complementary perspectives allow us to identify and describe entrepreneurship cases where we can observe how digitization has permeated technology entrepreneurship. Similarly, the entrepreneurial activities and their sequence (Brush et al., 2008 Lichtenstein, 2015) or the acquisition and timing of resources affect survival and the likelihood of growth (Bhawe et al., 2016 Klyver & Schenkel, 2013). Prior research has highlighted the entrepreneur–opportunity nexus, suggesting that the type and nature of a technology opportunity can be a determining factor in the activation of the entrepreneurial process (Davidsson, 2015 Gruber et al., 2012). To make sense of how much digitization has changed technology entrepreneurship, we propose to examine the topic from three different angles: the underlying technological opportunity, the entrepreneurship process, and the resource acquisition. This revolution has not only changed how organizations connect with customers, but it has also transformed the meaning of technology entrepreneurship. In subsequent five years after Facebook became a public company, we have witnessed a mobile and social media revolution (Hanna et al., 2011). Around the time when Bailetti’s article was published, the largest ever initial public offering (IPO) from a technology company took place: Facebook raised over $16 billion USD upon becoming listed in the stock market (Rusli & Eavis, 2012). His definition highlights that technology entrepreneurship is “an investment in a project that assembles and deploys specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets that are intricately related to advances in scientific and technological knowledge for the purpose of creating and capturing value for a firm” (Bailetti, 2012). We have reached a consolidation stage in technology entrepreneurship research.Ī seminal contribution to the definition of technology entrepreneurship as a field was made by Tony Bailetti. Indeed, Mosey, Guerrero, and Greenman (2017) have stated that, after two decades of interest and research contributions in the field, we all can now take stock of what has been achieved, what needs to be revisited, and what is still missing. With this new delineation of terms, we would like to foster discussion between researchers, entrepreneurs, and policy makers on the impact of digitization on entrepreneurship, and set a future research agenda.ĭo we need another definition in entrepreneurship research? We argue that at least technology entrepreneurship deserves a revision. Based on current examples, we identify and describe characterizations of technology entrepreneurship, digital technology entrepreneurship, and digital entrepreneurship. This article is focused on the identification and description of technology entrepreneurship in times of digitization. The multiple possible combinations of technology and entrepreneurship have resulted in a diversity of phenomena with significantly different characteristics and socio-economic impact. However, recent developments in the context of digital entrepreneurship call for revision and advancement. ![]() Technology entrepreneurship is an established concept in academia. ![]() #Agenda definition downloadFerran Giones, Alexander Brem Download this article as a PDFĮntrepreneurship is the key to emerging technologies.Įntrepreneur and computer scientist Abstract ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |